Motivation and affect in peer argumentation and socio - cognitive conflict
نویسندگان
چکیده
Whereas the cognitive processes and effects of collaborative learning have been intensively studied within the Learning Sciences, little attention has been paid to the way motivational and emotional factors may affect them. In this symposium, we present recent findings from three independent lines of research that focus on the way motivation and affect shape the interaction between peer learners and how this, in turn, affects cognitive gains from this interaction. All three presentations focus on learning within a socio-cognitive conflict task design, while drawing on different data sources, each highlighting different aspects of the interaction process: (1) Students self-reported perceptions of the self, the other and the interaction; (2) Epistemic and motivational features of verbal dialogue content; and (3) Interactants’ emotional reactions using facial signals and content-free vocal parameters of speech. The findings shed new light on how motivational and affective factors may promote or inhibit productive interactions in the face of socio-cognitive conflict.
منابع مشابه
Processes of argumentation and explanation in conceptual change: results from protocol analyses of peer-to-peer dialogue
Decades of research have proven that many misconceptions of scientific notions are difficult to uproot even after intensive instructional interventions. In this paper we examine the role of argumentation and of explanation development in dyadic dialogues and their relation to consequential individual conceptual change. Two quantitative dialogue coding schemes were developed with different granu...
متن کاملP. Jermann & P. Dillenbourg Elaborating New Arguments through a Cscl Script
The CSCL community faces two main challenges with respect to learning and argumentation. The scientific challenge is to understand how argumentation produces learning, that is to discover which cognitive mechanisms, triggered by argumentative interactions, generate new knowledge and in which conditions. The engineering challenge is to determine how to trigger productive argumentation among stud...
متن کاملThe socio - cognitive theory in information retrieval (IR)
Abstract Background and Aim: The socio-cognitive theory introduced in information science by Horland and Alberchtsen. The socio-cognitive view turns the traditional cognitive program upside down. The socio-cognitive theory emphasizes on different cultural and social structures of users. Hence, the aim of the article is to explain the role of socio - cognitive theory in information retrieval (I...
متن کاملInducing socio-cognitive conflict in Finnish and German groups of online learners by CSCL script
10 11 Abstract Collaborative learners are often meant to be guided by collaboration scripts to 12 identify, discuss, and resolve differences of opinion and knowledge. How learners engage in 13 and resolve conflict, however, may be highly dependent on learners’ cultural background. In 14 this article, we examine the extent to which a peer-critique collaboration script induces socio15 cognitive c...
متن کاملThe Agent Argumentation Architecture Revisited⋆
The Agent Argumentation Architecture (AAA) has been recently proposed [1] as an abstract model by means of which an autonomous agent argues with itself to manage its motivations and arbitrate its possibly conflicting internal goals. In an attempt to show how the AAA model can be instantiated, we revisit the original model with a concrete argumentation framework illustrating how the internal dia...
متن کامل